Thursday, April 26, 2012

The Fabulous Straight-Edge Life


Over the last month I’ve mentioned CM Punk and his straight-edge lifestyle quite a bit. I’ve also gone into my own “straight-edgeness” (if you will) and related it to that of Punk and his ongoing storyline with Chris Jericho.

Don’t worry: this one won’t focus on wrestling much, if at all.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Why I Want to Join Mensa


I think I’ve mentioned to a few people that I’m interested in joining Mensa. Might have even mentioned it in a previous entry. I don’t think I ever got into why I have this particular interest, so I’ll do that now.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Why I'm Never Getting Married


So I’ve finally figured out the main reason why I need not ever get married. It came to me in the form of a question that someone posed on Facebook. The question was…

…after you get married, who should be the most important person in your life: your mother or your spouse?

Monday, April 23, 2012

The Unattractiveness of Being Smart


Sometimes I run across tweets that inspire me to write. This would happen to be one of those times.

One of my Twitter peoples retweeted a woman saying she’d take a smart man over an attractive man.

Anyone got the number for BS? I need to make a call.
 

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Thinking Like A Man

Yes, this is about the movie.

Yes, I am going to see it.

Now that I've gotten that out of the way (yes, that's a Steve Harvey shout out), let's get to it.


Wednesday, April 11, 2012

The Best Wrestler of All Time


Saw a tweet asking whether the Undertaker was the best wrestler of all time since he’s been in 20 WrestleManias (and if you need to ask how he’s done in those 20, please exit stage left). My immediate answer was no; as names like Austin, Hogan, Michaels, and Flair came to mind. Then I started thinking: they have their warts too. I’ll get to those below, but it’s really interesting how arguments would have to vary about who the best wrestler of all time is. Let’s look at some guys (I’m sorry, but there isn’t a female wrestler I can put up there) and see their cases.

Monday, April 9, 2012

Brown Isn't Really Black

Was thinking about something to write about and had no clue. Was going to simply do a 20-something and then the idea came to me. In honor of this whole Coming To America thing, I'm going to talk about a few things that (most) black people (I know) like and I don't...and things I like that (most) black people (I know) don't. They won't be grouped together, as I'm thinking of them randomly.

Monday, March 26, 2012

A Cult of Two Personalities (Part II)


So I left off with how the current CM Punk storyline mirrors my own life in a few ways, particularly a possible effect of something that Chris Jericho said. Last week (right after I posted), Punk mentioned in a promo that he was proud of the strides his father has made. That’s where I’ll pick up.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Reasons...Three Months Later


So, as most everyone knows; I decided three months ago that I was done with women/dating. In this time, I have thought about a few things and I am still as grounded as ever in my decision. I don’t think I ever gave expanded reasoning for it, other than outlining the events that led to it. I’ll go ahead and do that, under the guise of explaining why it is so easy to stick with it.

Monday, March 19, 2012

A Cult of Two Personalities

For those of you who don't know, I'm a wrestling fan. I'm actually going to WrestleMania this year, since it's in Miami and I have a friend getting married that same weekend. Well, I was going to WrestleMania anyway: I bought my ticket before I was invited to the wedding. At any rate, I'm going.


Sunday, March 11, 2012

American Pride

As many of y’all - shoot, just about everyone reading this on FB should - know, I’m from South Florida. Everyone also knows that South Florida has a large population of people who come from the islands.

Note: if you’re from the islands (especially if you’re female), you’re liable to not like me very much by the end of this piece.

For some reason I thought back to a time in high school when I was asked this question (by one of my FB friends, actually)…

Thursday, March 8, 2012

What Would BIG Do?

So I have something new to talk about. Fifteen years ago tomorrow (well, not the day I'm writing this; but the day I'm posting it) Christopher Wallace was killed in a shooting out in LA. I'm not going to recap anything from that or even run down a list of my favorite songs by Mr. Wallace...now. I'm going to instead ask a hypothetical question.

If Wallace were still alive, would he still be rapping?

My answer? Heck no.

Why not?

Well, that's what the rest of this is about.


Monday, March 5, 2012

Lowest Common Denominator

I said I was going to stop talking about dating/relationship type stuff, but a tweet I saw and responded to made me realize there's something that needs to be discussed. Someone who one of my friends retweeted said that rule #1 for any "relational" (as opposed to relationship) partner was that they had to have a vagina. I said that the condition was necessary, but not sufficient. Guy then replied to me and said that sometimes it is sufficient.

Now, my mind immediately went to the fact that guys have been falling all over themselves for it for years and years. Even though there are so many reasons to not do so - friendships, finances, family - fools still go all out for it. Jay-Z and R Kelly made a song about it. Many rappers have made songs outlining the dangers of such behavior, although the message is often clouded by some accompanying presentation which a large segment of the population considers to be misogynistic.

I'm not arguing 'for' or 'against' on that point, because that's not what this is about. What this is about is one simple thing that guys who go all out seem to forget: something that has economic application even though it's a mathematical concept.


Sunday, February 26, 2012

The Small Market: Life and Death of the Sporting World (Part IV)

Preserve your product, small-market owners. You are not the product. If fans turn against the players, they turn against the sport (once again: if you’re an NBA fan, you know this). Shoot, MLB fans know it too: MLB owners - NFL owners too, to an extent - were just smart enough to frame their grievances in a manner that didn’t hurt the game. They blamed large-market owners…which isn’t much better, but is much more palatable…because it doesn’t hurt the product.

Shoot, an argument could be made that it helps. Fans rally around their teams as the David vs. Goliath narrative takes over. Everyone gets involved and picks up their slingshots. Easy stories to write, interesting plotlines to develop…win-win.


The Small Market: Life and Death of the Sporting World (Part III)

Seriously, what costs more: one good scouting person or five good players?

No one, but no one, gets this better than the Tampa Bay Rays (please let someone be smart enough to get that team a stadium in Westshore or Channelside). Draft, groom, bring them up, sign the best ones, and trade the rest for more players who they can…groom, bring them up, sign if they’re good enough, and so on. That’s how you compete with a low payroll….which could be higher if owners weren’t greedy.


The Small Market: Life and Death of the Sporting World (Part II)

It’s these fans - and fans like them in other cities - that keep the sports world going. Fans in places like Milwaukee, Orlando, Seattle, Salt Lake City, and Kansas City have as much to do with the success of sports franchises as fans in the cities mentioned above. They go out and they support their teams…

“…no. they don’t. No one goes to the games in the small markets and that’s why their revenues are lower…”

Anyone with half a background in business or economics knows that the statement in quotes is patently false. Many factors contribute to sports team revenues, and in the cases of some teams they make a profit before they sell one ticket thanks to their leagues’ revenue-sharing policies. People stay away from games for one of two reasons: either the team isn’t good or the prices are too high - and it’s more the latter than the former. This is a rather basic concept in economics: teams charge the highest amount that the largest number of fans will pay for tickets. If the ticket prices are low enough, people will come. If the team is good enough, people will come.

There are exceptions, but there are also reasons for those exceptions. I would list some, but this is going to be long enough as is. I’ll instead jump into the main reason why small-market attendance is down in many cases, and also introduce that group as the entity that works as hard to ruin sports as small-market fans do to keep sports going…and they won’t have to look far to find this group.

I’m talking about small-market owners.

Small-market owners want to have their cake, eat it, and have the cake be provided for free. The obvious poster child for this is Cleveland Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert, who’s made a complete [donkey] of himself in the past year and a half. By the way, honorable mention goes to the Spurs owner (whose name I forget) for singing the woes of the small market while being blinded by the four titles his team has won since 1999.

I could talk about individual small-market owners all day, but I’m at about 900 words so…small-market owners complain that they can’t make money, can’t win, and/or can’t keep their best players. The NBA has a unique problem that I’ll avoid for the sake of brevity (a concept which quickly - and often - goes out the window when I write, but whatever), but generally speaking these owners go about the process all wrong.

If you know you’re basically being subsidized by your league, give the fans a break. I don’t know the core financials of any sports teams, but I will say that no team whose subsidy exceeds its expenses should charge fans more than $50 for any ticket. You’re already making a profit: give the fans the maximum opportunity to enjoy your team. You still get that bit of ticket money, not to mention the added income that comes from other gameday functions. To do anything else is to simply be greedy.

As far as winning goes…put some money in your scouting departments. This is obvious in baseball, but it works in football and basketball as well. Getting good scouts is by far the easiest and most cost-effective way to save money on talent. Even large-market teams get this: look at the Dallas Cowboys. After dealing with Roy Williams’s incompetence, they gave a chance to a small-school guy. Small-school guy ripped shop and became one of the league’s better WRs. His name is Miles Austin. This season, Austin gets hurt. The Cowboys (with help from Norv Turner) have this other small-school guy…who rips shop and may well become one of the league’s better WRs. His name is Laurent Robinson. Meet the new Miles Austin, same as the old Miles Austin. Not only is Robinson good, but he’s cheap. Obviously, not every team can then sign a guy to a long-term deal like the Cowboys did with Austin. That’s cool: s’why there are things called trades. Wash, rinse, repeat.

Seriously, what costs more: one good scouting person or five good players?

The Small Market: Life and Death of the Sporting World (Part I)

*This was originally finished a month and a half ago (as people will notice with the mention of the Packers as Super Bowl champions), but never released. Sigh.
 
I’ve been trying to think of something to write. I’m about tired of talking about dating/relationship topics and I haven’t felt like delving back into the one big topic I was writing on at some point (perhaps this would be a good time to pass on what I’ve already written on that to my prospective collaborator, but I digress). So I racked my brain and thought - what better to write about than…

…sports.

I try to stay away from sports on here (especially football, since I do something on that every week), but I think there’s an interesting topic on which I can come up with a few words…and maybe it’ll have some non-sporting application.

(Ed. note: there are four parts due to the length of the piece.)


Saturday, February 11, 2012

The Whitney Houston Post

I originally planned on writing about Jeremy Lin and the craze involving him...and I will, assuming that circumstances still warrant in about a week. However, that all changed when news broke tonight that Whitney Houston died.

In the last two and a half years we've lost the two biggest black musical voices of the 80s (I'm only using race as a divider because Madonna would likely be the biggest female voice). I'm not going to write about the parallels between Michael Jackson and Whitney, even though there are quite a few. This is going to be all Whitney - well, it'll be all Whitney as far as my memories.


Sunday, January 29, 2012

Dirty Macks of Hip Hop

So, thanks to CJStarchild (that's his Twitter handle); I've been introduced to the term "dirty mack". He got it from sportswriter Bomani Jones. Basically, a dirty mack (in this context) is a singer who moves in on another man's girl in a song.

Now R&B is too wide a genre of music to do this with, so I've decided to make a "fun, but not definitive or exhaustive" ranking of dirty macks in hip hop. This'll probably just be a top ten - okay, I made it five...and I already know who #1 has to be without thinking about it much. A man's ranking will depend mainly on the dirtiness of the macking in the song and how big the song got. I'll list some other notable efforts before getting to the top 5 - and I think the top 5 is pretty unquestionable.


Thursday, January 26, 2012

Thoughts on the Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation Survey


I came across an interesting survey the other day thanks to a friend of mine posting about it. It’s the Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation effort that asked questions of black and white respondents of each sex.

The questions all had 4 or 5 possible responses on Likert type scales. All of the percentages, unless otherwise noted, will be for the strongest response (strongly agree, very important, and so on). Going to pick out a few of these questions and vibe a bit.